Home > Indian Polity > Inter State Relations

Inter State Relations

Inter State Relations

The successful functioning of the Indian federal system depends not only on the harmonious
relations and close cooperation between the Centre and the states but also between the states
inter se. Hence, the Constitution makes the following provisions with regard to inter-state

1. Adjudication of inter-state water disputes.
2. Coordination through inter-state councils.
3. Mutual recognition of public acts, records and judicial proceedings.
4. Freedom of inter-state trade, commerce and intercourse.
In addition, the zonal councils have been established by the Parliament to promote inter-state
cooperation and coordination.


Article 262 of the Constitution provides for the adjudication of inter-state water disputes. It makes
two provisions:

(i) Parliament may by law provide for the adjudication of any dispute or complaint with respect
to the use, distribution and control of waters of any inter-state river and river valley.

(ii) Parliament may also provide that neither the Supreme Court nor any other court is to exercise
jurisdiction in respect of any such dispute or complaint.

Under this provision, the Parliament has enacted two laws [the River Boards Act (1956) and the
Inter-State Water Disputes Act (1956)]. The River Boards Act provides for the establishment of river
boards for the regulation and development of inter-state river and river valleys. A river board is
established by the Central government on the request of the state governments concerned to advise

The Inter-State Water Disputes Act empowers the Central government to set up an ad hoc tribunal for
the adjudication of a dispute between two or more states in relation to the waters of an inter-state
river or river valley. The decision of the tribunal would be final and binding on the parties to the
dispute. Neither the Supreme Court nor any other court is to have jurisdiction in respect of any water
dispute which may be referred to such a tribunal under this Act.

The need for an extra judicial machinery to settle inter-state water disputes is as follows: “The
Supreme Court would indeed have jurisdiction to decide any dispute between states in connection
with water supplies, if legal rights or interests are concerned; but the experience of most countries
has shown that rules of law based upon the analogy of private proprietary interests in water do not
afford a satisfactory basis for settling disputes between the states where the interests of the public at
large in the proper use of water supplies are involved.”1

So far (2013), the Central government has set up eight inter-state water dispute tribunals.



Article 263 contemplates the establishment of an Inter-State Council to effect coordination between
the states and between Centre and states. Thus, the President can establish such a council if at any
time it appears to him that the public interest would be served by its establishment. He can define the
nature of duties to be performed by such a council and its organisation and procedure.
Even though the president is empowered to define the duties of an inter-state council, Article 263
specifies the duties that can be assigned to it in the following manner:

(a) enquiring into and advising upon disputes which may arise between states;

(b) investigating and discussing subjects in which the states or the Centre and the states have a
common interest; and

(c) making recommendations upon any such subject, and particularly for the better co-ordination
of policy and action on it.

“The council’s function to enquire and advice upon inter-state disputes is complementary to the
Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Article 131 to decide a legal controversy between the
governments. The Council can deal with any controversy whether legal or non-legal, but its function
is advisory unlike that of the court which gives a binding decision.”2

Under the above provisions of Article 263, the president has established the following councils to
make recommendations for the better coordination of policy and action in the related subjects:

• Central Council of Health.

• Central Council of Local Government and Urban Development.3

• Four Regional Councils for Sales Tax for the Northern, Eastern, Western and Southern Zones.

The Central Council of Indian Medicine and the Central Council of Homoeopathy were set up under
the Acts of Parliament.4

Establishment of Inter-State Council

The Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State Relations (1983–87) made a strong case for the
establishment of a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263 of the Constitution. It
recommended that in order to differentiate the Inter-State Council from other bodies established under
the same Article 263, it must be called as the Inter-Governmental Council. The Commission
recommended that the Council should be charged with the duties laid down in clauses (b) and (c) of
Article 263 (see above).

In pursuance of the above recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission, the Janata Dal
Government headed by V. P. Singh established the Inter-State Council in 1990. 5 It consists of the
following members:

(i) Prime minister as the Chairman
(ii) Chief ministers of all the states
(iii) Chief ministers of union territories having legislative assemblies
(iv) Administrators of union territories not having legislative assemblies
(v) Governors of States under President’s rule
(vi) Six Central cabinet ministers, including the home minister, to be nominated by the Prime

Five Ministers of Cabinet rank / Minister of State (independent charge) nominated by the Chairman of
the Council (i.e., Prime Minister) are permanent invitees to the Council.

The council is a recommendatory body on issues relating to inter-state, Centre–state and Centre–union
territories relations. It aims at promoting coordination between them by examining, discussing and
deliberating on such issues. Its duties, in detail, are as follows:

• investigating and discussing such subjects in which the states or the centre have a common
• making recommendations upon any such subject for the better coordination of policy and
action on it; and
• deliberating upon such other matters of general interest to the states as may be referred to it by
the chairman.

The Council may meet at least thrice in a year. Its meetings are held in camera and all questions are
decided by consensus.

There is also a Standing Committee of the Council. It was set up in 1996 for continuous consultation
and processing of matters for the consideration of the Council. It consists of the following members:

(i) Union Home Minister as the Chairman
(ii) Five Union Cabinet Ministers
(iii) Nine Chief Ministers

The Council is assisted by a secretariat called the Inter-State Council Secretariat. This secretariat
was set-up in 1991 and is headed by a secretary to the Government of India. Since 2011, it is also
functioning as the secretariat of the Zonal Councils.


Under the Constitution, the jurisdiction of each state is confined to its own territory. Hence, it is
possible that the acts and records of one state may not be recognised in another state. To remove any
such difficulty, the Constitution contains the “Full Faith and Credit” clause which lays down the

(i) Full faith and credit is to be given throughout the territory of India to public acts, records and
judicial proceedings of the Centre and every state. The expression ‘public acts’ includes both
legislative and executive acts of the government. The expression ‘public record’ includes any
official book, register or record made by a public servant in the discharge of his official

(ii) The manner in which and the conditions under which such acts, records and proceedings are
to be proved and their effect determined would be as provided by the laws of Parliament.
This means that the general rule mentioned above is subject to the power of Parliament to lay
down the mode of proof as well as the effect of such acts, records and proceedings of one
state in another state.

(iii) Final judgements and orders of civil courts in any part of India are capable of execution
anywhere within India (without the necessity of a fresh suit upon the judgement). The rule
applies only to civil judgements and not to criminal judgements. In other words, it does not
require the courts of a state to enforce the penal laws of another state.


Articles 301 to 307 in Part XIII of the Constitution deal with the trade, commerce and intercourse
within the territory of India.

Article 301 declares that trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be
free. The object of this provision is to break down the border barriers between the states and to
create one unit with a view to encourage the free flow of trade, commerce and intercourse in the
country. The freedom under this provision is not confined to inter-state trade, commerce and
intercourse but also extends to intra-state trade, commerce and intercourse. Thus, Article 301 will be
violated whether restrictions are imposed at the frontier of any state or at any prior or subsequent

The freedom guaranteed by Article 301 is a freedom from all restrictions, except those which are
provided for in the other provisions (Articles 302 to 305) of Part XIII of the Constitution itself. These
are explained below:

(i) Parliament can impose restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse
between the states or within a state in public interest.6 But, the Parliament cannot give
preference to one state over another or discriminate between the states except in the case of
scarcity of goods in any part of India.

(ii) The legislature of a state can impose reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade,
commerce and intercourse with that state or within that state in public interest. But, a bill for
this purpose can be introduced in the legislature only with the previous sanction of the
president. Further, the state legislature cannot give preference to one state over another or
discriminate between the states.

(iii) The legislature of a state can impose on goods imported from other states or the union
territories any tax to which similar goods manufactured in that state are subject. This
provision prohibits the imposition of discriminatory taxes by the state.

(iv) The freedom (under Article 301) is subject to the nationalisation laws (i.e., laws providing
for monopolies in favour of the Centre or the states). Thus, the Parliament or the state
legislature can make laws for the carrying on by the respective government of any trade,
business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or

The Parliament can appoint an appropriate authority for carrying out the purposes of the above
provisions relating to the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse and restricts on it. The
Parliament can also confer on that authority the necessary powers and duties. But, no such authority
has been appointed so far.7


The Zonal Councils are the statutory (and not the constitutional) bodies. They are established by an
Act of the Parliament, that is, States Reorganisation Act of 1956. The act divided the country into five
zones (Northern, Central, Eastern, Western and Southern) and provided a zonal council for each zone.
While forming these zones, several factors have been taken into account which include: the natural
divisions of the country, the river systems and means of communication, the cultural and linguistic
affinity and the requirements of economic development, security and law and order.

Each zonal council consists of the following members: (a) home minister of Central government. (b)
chief ministers of all the States in the zone. (c) Two other ministers from each state in the zone. (d)
Administrator of each union territory in the zone.

Besides, the following persons can be associated with the zonal council as advisors (i.e., without the
right to vote in the meetings):

(i) a person nominated by the Planning Commission; (ii) chief secretary of the government of each
state in the zone; and (iii) development commissioner of each state in the zone.

The home minister of Central government is the common chairman of the five zonal councils. Each
chief minister acts as a vice-chairman of the council by rotation, holding office for a period of one
year at a time.

The zonal councils aim at promoting cooperation and coordination between states, union territories
and the Centre. They discuss and make recommendations regarding matters like economic and social
planning, linguistic minorities, border disputes, inter-state transport, and so on. They are only
deliberative and advisory bodies.

The objectives (or the functions) of the zonal councils, in detail, are as follows:
• To achieve an emotional integration of the country.

• To help in arresting the growth of acute state-consciousness, regionalism, linguism and
particularistic trends.

• To help in removing the after-effects of separation in some cases so that the process of
reorganisation, integration and economic advancement may synchronise.

• To enable the Centre and states to cooperate with each other in social and economic matters
and exchange ideas and experience in order to evolve uniform policies.

• To cooperate with each other in the successful and speedy execution of major development

• To secure some kind of political equilibrium between different regions of the country.

North-Eastern Council

North-Eastern Council was created by a separate Act of Parliament—the North-Eastern Council Act of 1971.8 Its members
include Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Arunchal Pradesh, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Tripura and Sikkim. 9
Its functions are similar to those of the zonal councils, but with few additions. It has to formulate a
unified and coordinated regional plan covering matters of common importance. It has to review from
time to time the measures taken by the member states for the maintenance of security and public order
in the region.




1. Report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee. Select Committee of the House of Lords
appointed to join with a Committee of the House of Commons to consider the future
Government of India.

2. M P Jain: Indian Constitutional Law, Wadhwa, Fourth Edition, P. 382.

3. It was originally known as the Central Council of Local Self-Government (1954).

4. India 2003, P. 242.

5. The Inter-State Council Order dated May 28, 1990.

6. For example, the Parliament has made the Essential Commodities Act (1955). This Act
enables the Central government to control the production, supply and distribution of certain
essential commodities like petroleum, coal, iron and steel and so on.

7. In USA such authority is known as the Inter-State Commerce Commission.

8. It came into existence on August 8, 1972.

9. In 2002, Sikkim was added as the eighth member of the North-Eastern Council.